Cover of: Antitrust implications of the College Bowl Alliance | United States Read Online
Share

Antitrust implications of the College Bowl Alliance Hearing before the Subcommittee on Antitrust, Business Rights, and Competition of the Committee on ... first session ... May 22, 1997 (S. hrg) by United States

  • 867 Want to read
  • ·
  • 84 Currently reading

Published by For sale by the U.S. G.P.O., Supt. of Docs., Congressional Sales Office .
Written in English


Book details:

The Physical Object
Number of Pages162
ID Numbers
Open LibraryOL7376166M
ISBN 100160554675
ISBN 109780160554674
OCLC/WorldCa37823630

Download Antitrust implications of the College Bowl Alliance

PDF EPUB FB2 MOBI RTF

The Bowl Alliance was an agreement among college football bowl games (specifically the Sugar, Orange, and Fiesta Bowls) for the purpose of trying to match the top two teams in a national championship bowl game and to provide quality bowl game matchups for the champions of its member conferences. The agreement was in place for the , , and seasons and had replaced the Bowl Championship trophy: AFCA National . Subcommittee on Antitrust, Business Rights, and Competition: Antitrust implications of the college Bowl Alliance: hearing before the Subcommittee on Antitrust, Business Rights and Competition of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, One Hundred Fifth Congress, first session Antitrust implications of the college Bowl Alliance: hearing before the Subcommittee on Antitrust, Business Rights and Competition of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, One Hundred Fifth Congress, first session ANTITRUST, GOVERNANCE, AND POSTSEASON COLLEGE FOOTBALL Michael A. McCann * Abstract: This Article examines the compatibility of the Bowl Champion-ship Series (BCS) with federal antitrust law and the appropriateness of the federal government using its formal and informal powers to encour-age a new format for postseason college football.

Antitrust Implications Surrounding The Bowl Championship Series: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis During the year history of college football, the game has evolved drastically. Alliance and Bowl Coalition, both of which failed to contract the Big Ten and Pac champions. Discover the best Antitrust Law in Best Sellers. Find the top most popular items in Amazon Books Best Sellers. The Abolition of Antitrust asserts that antitrust laws--on economic, legal, and moral grounds--are bad, and provides convincing evidence supporting arguments for their total abolition. Every year, new antitrust prosecutions arise in the U.S. courts, as in the cases against 3M and Visa/MasterCard, as well as a number of ongoing antitrust cases, such as those involving Microsoft and college football's /5(7). NCAA can violate antitrust laws with rules that affect commercial activity such as limits on the number of games that could be televised and rules restricting coaches salaries If leagues are not single entities, these labor issues have antitrust implications.

The Bowl Championship Series [electronic resource]: is it fair and in compliance with antitrust law? Antitrust implications of the College Bowl Alliance [microform]: hearing before the Subcommittee on Ant. Cases are listed alphabetically by the last name of individual defendants, by company name, or by the entity's first name. Amicus curiae briefs are listed by plaintiff's name. A&L Mayer Associates, Inc. A&L Mayer Associates, Inc.; A&L Mayer, Inc.; and Fibras Saltillo, S.A. de C.V. A-1 Auto Glass, Inc. The AAV Companies; ARA Services Inc., and.   Despite hearing the word "antitrust" for months in conjunction with the NFL, the unanimous response was that you wanted to hear more if it concerned what a suit would mean to college football as.   U.S. District Judge Claudia Wilken’s ruling in the grant-in-aid cap antitrust litigation has upended the NCAA’s long-standing model of .